Prerequisites
Why another description is needed
The earlier chapters used a charge and its field to calculate a force. At atomic scales, classical pictures alone do not describe the allowed bound energies of electrons. Quantum theory supplies a different framework. This chapter introduces the vocabulary needed before discussing solids, using arithmetic rather than calculus.
Use probabilities with care
Quantum theory uses amplitudes to predict events. An event's probability is obtained from the squared magnitude of its amplitude. Amplitudes may be complex numbers and can interfere; they are not ordinary probabilities to be added indiscriminately.
Suppose a normalized state has two mutually exclusive measurement outcomes with real amplitudes 0.6 and 0.8. “Normalized” means the outcome probabilities sum to one.
| Outcome | Real amplitude in this example | Probability |
|---|---|---|
| A | 0.6 | 0.36 |
| B | 0.8 | 0.64 |
The probabilities total 0.36 + 0.64 = 1. Across many identically prepared measurements these probabilities describe statistical expectations, not a guaranteed schedule of outcomes. The amplitudes are supplied as inputs to the exercise.
Read allowed energy levels
An atom's bound electronic states have discrete allowed energies. In a radiative transition to a lower-energy state, the emitted photon carries the energy difference.
For a three-level teaching model, let the allowed energies be 0, 2 and 5 energy units. An energy unit here is just the chosen scale of the exercise, not a measured atomic constant.
| Initial energy (units) | Final energy (units) | Emitted energy (units) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | 0 | 5 |
The two-step route 5 → 2 → 0 releases the same total energy as 5 → 0: 3 + 2 = 5 units. That agreement is an energy balance. It does not mean both routes have the same transition probability or duration.
Separate a possible energy from an allowed transition
Knowing the difference between two levels is not enough to predict whether a particular interaction can connect them. In this model, the listed radiative transitions are assumed possible. We have not computed transition rules, lifetimes or spectra.
Likewise, “quantum” does not mean every measurable quantity takes only a few values: the discreteness described here concerns bound stationary energy levels.
Try it yourself
- Square a real amplitude of 0.5 to obtain its probability for a specified outcome.
- In the three-level model, how much energy must be supplied for 2 → 5?
- Can a level diagram alone predict a transition's waiting time?
Answers and limits
The probability is 0.25; the other outcomes must supply the remaining probability in a normalized description. The energy increase is 3 units. Waiting times need additional physics. Wave equations, complex arithmetic and selection rules remain further study.
Next: heat and energy.
Verification record
- Sources assessed by Codex (assistant)
- Example checks recorded
- Independent human review pending
Selected claims have been assessed against the passages below. This record does not certify every sentence or guarantee correctness.
Inspect claims, evidence and limitations
Source assessment: . 2 of 2 selected claims marked supported by the assessor. This is not a coverage percentage for the article.
Quantum event probabilities are obtained from squared magnitudes of amplitudes, rather than treating amplitudes as ordinary probabilities.
Assessor finding: supported · definition · Article passage
- Feynman Lectures, volume III, chapter 2 — sections 2–1 and 2–5: amplitudes and energy levels — Section 2–1, probability wave amplitudes
Passage read: Read the cited passage in the source page during preparation on 2026-10-25.
The selected statement is source-supported; numerical inputs and teaching scenarios in this article are original assumptions.
- Feynman Lectures, volume III, chapter 2 — sections 2–1 and 2–5: amplitudes and energy levels — Section 2–1, probability wave amplitudes
Bound atomic stationary energies are discrete, and an emitted photon carries the energy difference of a radiative transition.
Assessor finding: supported · model · Article passage
- Feynman Lectures, volume III, chapter 2 — sections 2–1 and 2–5: amplitudes and energy levels — Section 2–5, energy levels, equations 2.14–2.16
Passage read: Read the cited passage in the source page during preparation on 2026-10-25.
The selected statement is source-supported; numerical inputs and teaching scenarios in this article are original assumptions.
- Feynman Lectures, volume III, chapter 2 — sections 2–1 and 2–5: amplitudes and energy levels — Section 2–5, energy levels, equations 2.14–2.16
Reproducible checks
- Recompute published resistor, force, flux, probability, level, thermal and lattice examples; check the reading prerequisite order.
Passed on 2026-10-27
node --test --test-name-pattern='physics examples respect circuit, field, quantum, energy and lattice models and reading prerequisites' src/library/physics.test.ts
Limits and open work
- Introductory assistant assessment of selected claims; independent human review remains pending.
- All numerical devices, amplitudes, levels and material parameters are stipulated examples, not measured properties or implementation specifications.
Independent human review
Pending. No independent human reviewer has signed off this version.
Content fingerprint: 95d2d325a350fc8e63db01bf81a20728327d6ed06cc903bb3a19be6321dc8515. An article change invalidates this assessment.
Sources
Published by devutils · Updated · Original explanatory text; sources retain their own terms.