The devutils collection

A GPU-trained convolutional network reports ImageNet results

The 2012 paper by Krizhevsky, Sutskever and Hinton documents a specific image-classification system and its evaluation.

On this page

A particular research result

Krizhevsky, Sutskever and Hinton's 2012 paper reports image classification using a deep convolutional network and an efficient GPU implementation. It documents a combination of data, training, architecture and evaluation rather than the invention of every neural network or the beginning of artificial intelligence.

Keep the benchmark attached to its task

An image-classification result concerns the stated data and evaluation procedure. It cannot establish how a system will perform on every new population, prove general intelligence or supply a complete explanation of later AI systems.

Context and limits

The modern-computing chapter places this publication beside the much earlier Dartmouth proposal, GPU programming, data evaluation and physical resource limits. Its classification-accuracy exercises are invented and must not be confused with this paper's measured results. This event uses publication-year precision. No model training, benchmark reproduction or independent replication was performed for the site's assessment.

Verification record

  • Sources assessed by Codex (assistant)
  • No executable example check recorded
  • Independent human review pending

Selected claims have been assessed against the passages below. This record does not certify every sentence or guarantee correctness.

Inspect claims, evidence and limitations

Source assessment: . 1 of 1 selected claims marked supported by the assessor. This is not a coverage percentage for the article.

  1. The 2012 paper by Krizhevsky, Sutskever and Hinton documents a specific image-classification system and its evaluation.

    Assessor finding: supported · historical · Article passage

    Selected documented milestone; no unqualified first-ever priority claim.

Reproducible checks

These historical or editorial claims have no executable truth test. Source assessment and human review remain separate.

Limits and open work

  • Publication, experiment and deployment are distinguished; no historical hardware or software was executed for this event.
  • Independent human review remains pending.

Independent human review

Pending. No independent human reviewer has signed off this version.

Content fingerprint: fbd3bf57adcff0174d80275a631e3d13362953e975db52a159dd3aab736bfce1. An article change invalidates this assessment.

Sources

  1. NeurIPS 2012, ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Published by devutils · Updated · Original explanatory text; sources retain their own terms.